You may have heard mention of a ‘de facto parallel province within the Church of England’ over these last few weeks.
The announcement of the Alliance to the commitment of its construction has been met with widespread appreciation within the evangelical constituency, but with various questions being raised. Let's look at two of those questions now.
What is a de facto parallel province?
The obvious point to make is that it is not an actual or real province – de facto is by contrast with de jure. At the same time, it can in practice be a very real and positive reality.
Imagine between 500 and 1,000 churches working together ‘as if’ they were an orthodox province within the Church of England. Imagine them using their money to support orthodox mission, ministry and evangelism. Imagine them receiving spiritual oversight from orthodox men and women of recognised national leadership stature. Imagine their ordinands being trained for ministry and institutions committed to orthodoxy, and curates being ordained by bishops upholding the apostolic faith as we have received it and being placed with orthodox training incumbents. And imagine all this being served by a college of bishops, clergy and lay leaders whose Biblical teaching and personal integrity is entirely consistent with the historic doctrine and teaching of the Church of England. This would describe what a ‘de facto parallel province’ looks like on the ground.
Why do we need a de facto parallel province?
In part, this is in order to enable the House of Bishops, and Church of England more widely, to appreciate just how widespread and deep is the concern caused by the ongoing LLF project. It is hoped that the strength of this widespread concern as evidenced by the reality of this de facto province could signal (indeed ‘shout’) the need for our archbishops and House of Bishops to commit to genuine negotiation with those wishing to contend for the historic faith in the Church of England, as against the currently empty promises of provision being made. It is also the case that whatever is constructed by way of a de facto parallel province could be the ‘seed’ of permanent provision – preferably within the Church of England.
Most en readers will agree that it appears that the House of Bishops are determined to drive the ‘Living in Love and Faith (LLF) bus’ forwards. They will also agree that this will take the Church of England to a place contrary to Scripture’s teaching. And while we pray for divine intervention and the miracle of the House of Bishops doing a U-turn, the Church of England Evangelical Council (CEEC) is convinced that we need to engage in large-scale and widespread protest in order for our voice to be heard in the meantime.
Participation in this de facto province is significant in that regard – and all those clergy and churches wishing to stand with the Alliance at this time should consider, firstly, whether they can use the Ephesian Fund for their parish share-giving, secondly, whether clergy can request the oversight being provided by CEEC, thirdly, if they can send ordinands through the new ‘pipeline’ being constructed, and, fourthly, whether in due course they can join new fellowship structures which will be created to support evangelism, church planting and gospel service to local church communities.
It has been suggested that the challenge of the autumn could be summed up as one of engaging in ‘principled protest’, in order that 2025 can see the emergence of ‘permanent provision’ through structural rearrangement within the Church of England.
And if all of this seems too fanciful for you, it’s worth us being reminded of those short, simple, but profound words: ‘But God.’ Humanly speaking, what we are seeking to achieve might seem impossible, but to believe that would be to disregard the God of the Bible. We contend. We pray. We carry on.
The most significant Synod motion in forty years?
In July this year, the Church of England could see the most significant Private Members Motion (PMM) on sex and …