Controversial legislation on asylum, immigration and refugees would create an ‘unjust and discriminatory system’, the Evangelical Alliance has told en.
Alicia Edmund, the EA’s Head of Public Policy, said the bill – detailed examination of which was beginning in the House of Lords on 27 January – means those fleeing religious persecution and conflict could end up being treated as criminals and deported without a fair hearing.
She said: ‘The UK asylum, immigration and refugee system is in desperate need of reform, but we at the Evangelical Alliance believe this bill creates an unjust and discriminatory system.
‘The most contentious principle in the bill (clause 11) is the ability for immigration officials to treat those seeking asylum differently, based on how they enter the country. It is often those fleeing religious persecution and conflict that will take the most dangerous journeys – such as small boat crossings and lorries – to access safety. Such individuals need greater protection rather than being treated as criminals, detained in subpar accommodation and deported without access to a fair hearing.
‘Many have spoken out against the bill, criticising its workability and fairness and challenging its compatibility with international law.’
She added: ‘In place of clause 11, we are calling the government to establish more safe and legal routes. Recent statistics reveal that only 9% of men, women and children who were given refugee status last year came through a resettlement scheme. This must change in 2022.
‘As Christians, our pursuit for justice is modelled by the example of Christ. We are compelled to care for those in need and to welcome the stranger’ (Matt.25:35). Welcome Churches has been a close ally on this policy issue. In 2021, Welcome Network churches welcomed over 5,500 people from across the world, offering support, hospitality, and community.’ She encouraged people to join that network.
Edmund added: ‘Our focus for 2022 will be to strengthen the bill as it passes through committee stage in the House of Lords, encouraging parliamentarians to pressure the government to create other safe and legal pathways.’
