The other week I watched the new Jurassic Park movie with our eldest son, and as soon as the movie finished (and it was ok by the way!) a curious thought entered my head. How many times has Jurassic Park been rebooted since the first movie in 1993?
There was the original, then the remake, now another reboot, and never mind the kids' Netflix series. I definitely think that velociraptors have now lost their sheen. I remember vividly watching that first movie and yet it has been rebooted more times than I have renewed my passport!
This is nothing new of course. Disney now recycles its own animations into live-action spectacles at a pace that barely allows children to outgrow the original before the remake arrives.
The nostalgic engine of modern entertainment is relentless.
The past, it seems, is not just remembered: it’s repackaged and sold back to us with a shinier finish and a familiar tune.
This doesn’t seem to be merely a cultural quirk; it appears a symptom of our society. We appear to live in an age of accelerated nostalgia. Where previous generations might have looked back fondly on decades gone by, we now get nostalgic about the early 2010s.
And the church, far from immune, is deeply entangled in this phenomenon. Whether it’s the "Christian" culture of our countries, or the high-water mark of post-war denominational attendance, churches often echo with longings for a bygone era: a time when pews were full, prayer warriors abounded, missionary giving and sending was thriving, and the culture seemed more aligned with Christian values.
But what’s driving this longing in us? And more importantly, what might it be costing us? What do we lose when we reach too often for the rear-view mirror?
Why do we long for the past?
Nostalgia is a refuge. The word “nostalgia” comes from two Greek words: nostos (“return home”) and algos (“longing”). It suggests a longing or homesickness for something that was.
In times of uncertainty and disorientation, it offers a curated version of the past, one where life felt simpler, with communities tighter, and God seemingly more present. Nostalgia has a way of dressing up memory. As Matt Miofsky notes, it is “the art of making the past seem better than it really was.” Or, as one pastor put it, “The good ol’ days weren’t that good; they were just old.” Churches often cling to selective memories, mistaking them for a golden age.
Of course, this isn’t entirely accurate; our memories tend to be editors rather than working with perfect recall. They smooth the rough edges and elevate the moments that affirmed our sense of purpose or identity. In short, they tell us what we want to be true. That tension makes nostalgia so potent, and so perilous, as “this can be sometimes a harmless solace, and occasionally a dangerous indulgence.”
For many in the church, nostalgia operates like liturgy. We rehearse stories of revival, sing songs from “back when hymns were good,” and idolise methods from previous decades as if they were sacred themselves.
Tracts still sell well because they were an effective tool in previous years. Radio stations still play Christian music because you never know who they might reach. We still pine for billboards and messages on public transport announcing the beauty of the gospel and our Saviour.
Underneath this is often a good impulse of course, the desire for authenticity, for community, for a move of God. But nostalgia can trick us into thinking the method is what made the moment.
What does Scripture have to say?
Theologically, we must remember what Scripture affirms again and again: God does not change. “Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever” (Hebrews 13v8). The God who moved in 1950s tent missions is the same God at work in micro-churches, suburban school halls, and house gatherings.
But when we confuse God’s past activity with a need to preserve the past, we begin to walk backwards into the future. This was a notable point made in TGC’s review of James K.A. Smith’s How To Inhabit Time. The church, the reviewer laments, has lost its temporal bearings. “Christians do need to discern their place in time, and that discernment seems to be at a particularly low ebb in some sectors of the church today.” Nostalgia thrives in precisely that low ebb.
The past can offer comfort, but false comfort, if we imagine it was ever free of complexity, pain, or compromise.
The same eras we idolise were often marked by exclusion, racism, abuse, sexism, and deep theological division.
Nostalgia without honesty is selective memory masquerading as faith. It’s a kind of spiritual revisionism that baptises our preferences and cloaks them in piety.
And yet, the draw remains powerful. Because when we feel adrift, whether that is culturally, morally, or spiritually, we long for anchors. And sometimes it’s easier to grab hold of a well-worn past method than to trust God for a new wineskin.
When nostalgia holds us back
There’s a subtle danger when nostalgia becomes the lens through which we interpret the present. It dulls our prophetic and missional imagination. It frames anything new as suspicious and paints change as decline. The result? A church becomes increasingly anxious, not because God has ceased working, but because we’ve stopped recognising Him when He shows up in unfamiliar ways.
I’ve seen churches not engage their communities because “people just aren’t interested in church anymore,” which is a statement that often means “people aren’t interested in church as we want it to be.”
I’ve spoken with leaders who lament that younger Christians “don’t have the same respect for the gospel,” not realising that those same younger believers are preaching the gospel in schools, colleges, WhatsApp groups, and TikTok reels. I admit, I barely understand this, and indeed have concerns about a disembodied Christian experience, but I do want to understand.
It’s not true that people aren’t interested; in fact we have seen a renewed interest in Christianity. However, if we are waiting until they discover "our way" then we might miss this moment that God seems to be bringing.
When we idealise a particular expression of church, be it hymn books or Hillsong, wooden pulpits, pews or folding chairs, we run the risk of canonising a cultural moment instead of contextualising the gospel.
What was once powerful can become something that hinders gospel advance.
The past begins to dictate not just our memory but our mission.
We see it in mission-funding models that refuse to support anything that doesn’t resemble mid-century church planting efforts, even though this puts serious pressure on those raising funds.
We hear it in discipleship programmes that assume every believer has a 9-to-5, a nuclear family, and a landline telephone.
The world has changed, but our frameworks haven’t. Nostalgia then has a way of fossilising ministry.
This doesn’t mean the past has no value. It means it must be interpreted with humility. Otherwise, we create idols of institutions and can resent the Spirit’s movement when He doesn’t follow our script or things take place within our tribe. Instead of seeking God’s guidance for today, we spend our energy trying to reanimate yesterday.
Honouring the past, embracing the present
There is a better way; perhaps we just haven’t seen it yet fully developed.
The church is not called to amnesia, nor to idol worship, but to appropriate remembrance.
The Bible regularly talks about the need to remember. We can honour the past without living in it. Biblical faith is built on memory, whether it’s the Exodus, the cross, the resurrection. But these memories are meant to propel us forward, not tether us to the past.
Some churches get this balance right. I recently listened to the Mortification of Spin podcast where Caleb Morell spoke of his book, A Light on the Hill: The Surprising Story of How a Local Church in the Nation’s Capital Influenced Evangelicalism. He warmly spoke of the ministry of Capitol Hill Baptist Church in Washington D.C. without going over the top. He honoured the past, while humbly desiring to continue that history by God’s grace. What spoke to me in the podcast is that tradition becomes a servant of mission, not a substitute for it. The church is a living body, not a museum. This means we don’t preserve our traditions under glass, but we ask whether they still serve the calling Christ has given us now.
This is especially urgent in small churches or rural communities, where traditions are more deeply embedded. The temptation is strong to assume that the very survival of the church depends on keeping everything “as it always was.” That may mean new wine, and new wineskins.
The key is discernment and discussion to understand what must we carry forward, and what must we leave behind? How can we tell the stories of past faithfulness without expecting God to copy and paste His methods?
Church traditions are gifts when they serve mission, but millstones when they resist it. We need the courage to differentiate between what is essential and what is simply familiar.
Finding stability in God’s ongoing story
At its heart, nostalgia is a cry for stability in an unstable world. Jared Wilson explains that nostalgia entices us with escape. “This is what nostalgia promises us, an exit from the tyranny of progress, the chaos of everything we see on the news and in our neighbourhood.” It offers comfort in the face of cultural anxiety, but at the price of truth.
But the gospel offers a deeper anchor. God’s story didn’t peak in our childhood, a particular dinosaur movie, or during our favourite decade of church music. It is unfolding now. Christ is alive, the Spirit is moving, and the Father is drawing people to Himself in every culture, in every generation, with fresh expressions of ancient truth.
We don’t need to manufacture the past then; we need to participate in the present. This requires courage, creativity, and a deep trust that God knows what He is doing.
To honour the past is to celebrate its faith. This is not about being trendy, or to buy into the latest fad. It’s about being faithful.
It’s about asking whether our methods are still the best ways to reach the people God has placed around us.
It’s about courageously updating our language, our structures, our assumptions, without ever changing the gospel and our convictions.
As I get older, I do find myself lamenting for what is left behind in the past. I do find myself lecturing my kids on "real" music, and how much bigger chocolate bars were in the 1980s. But I need to grieve what’s gone without pretending it was perfect.
Because God is not done. Not with the church. Not with the world. Not with us.
And His story isn’t over yet.
Subscribe to Jonny Pollock on Substack.
This piece has been republished with permission.
Are you limiting your ministry trainee?
One of the uncomfortable tests of leadership development is less about whether people grow under us, but whether we are …